Fibery

fibery.io ↗

Build a connected team wiki that combines rich-text documents, searchable databases, and linked workspaces.

SI Score
75/100
Pricing
Freemium AI reading, not confirmed
Free plan
Yes AI reading, not confirmed
Sign-up required
Not confirmed

Ask SI about Fibery

Answers use saved listing facts and recorded sources.
Homepage screenshot
Screenshot of the Fibery homepage

What it does

Fibery is a configurable work OS with wiki and document capabilities. Its official guide describes creating a wiki, while product documentation covers rich-text documents, databases, and search across workspace content. Pricing lists a free plan for up to 10 users and paid Standard at $12, Pro at $20, and Enterprise at $40 per user per month when billed annually.

Fibery combines a wiki with databases and other workspace objects, allowing teams to link explanatory documents to the work and information they describe. Its public guide walks users through creating a wiki, while product documentation describes rich-text documents, searchable databases, and connected workspace data. This makes Fibery more configurable than a standalone wiki, but it also means administrators need to design a workspace structure that fits the team.

The official subscription guide lists a free allowance for up to 10 users and annual-billing prices of $12 per user for Standard, $20 for Pro, and $40 for Enterprise. Fibery is a broader work platform, so its wiki is one component of a larger system. I reviewed the official wiki and billing guides; I did not create a workspace or test search and permissions.

Strengths

  • Wiki documents can be connected to databases and other structured workspace content.
  • A free tier and three published annual tiers give teams visible starting choices.

Watch out for

  • The wiki is part of a configurable work OS, which can require setup beyond adopting a standalone documentation tool.

Best for

  • Teams that want internal documentation linked to databases, projects, or other work objects.
  • Organizations willing to configure a flexible workspace rather than use a fixed wiki structure.

Sources