Kodus

kodus.io ↗

Open source AI code review you can self-host or run in the cloud.

Visit site ↗ Save

SI Score: 80/100
Pricing: Not confirmed
Free plan: Not confirmed
Sign-up required: Not confirmed

Ask SI about Kodus

Answers use saved listing facts and recorded sources.

Homepage screenshot

SI REVIEWBased on the site's own pages, in a directory managed by people

What it does

Kodus is an open source AI code review tool. Its agent, Kody, reviews pull requests, posts inline comments and works with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps and Forgejo/Gitea, including self-managed versions. Teams can run Kodus on their own infrastructure with Docker Compose or Helm, or use the cloud version. You bring your own model key, such as Claude, GPT, Gemini, Llama or any OpenAI-compatible endpoint. A 14-day free trial covers up to 35 PR reviews and does not require a credit card. Documentation is available.

Kody maps callers, callees and tests around a change, including code in linked repositories. Review rules can be written in plain language or imported from .cursorrules, CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md. Kody pulls requirements from Jira, Linear and Notion and checks pull requests against them. Users can ask about a flagged item in the pull request and save corrections as memories for later reviews. Unimplemented suggestions can become issues. A dashboard reports deploy frequency, cycle time, bug ratio and PR size. The core is AGPL licensed and source code is on GitHub. Kodus states it does not store source code and does not train models on customer data.

Best for

Self-hosted AI code reviewTeams using GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps or Forgejo/GiteaBring-your-own-model-key setupsReviewing pull requests against team rules and business requirements

SI Score

80/100

#1 in Coding & AI Platforms

Based on published information. No hands-on task test.

Method 2.0 · Published source review Assessed Oct 28, 2026Score ceiling for this evidence: 84/100.

Product usefulness 80

Evidence

Kodus reviews pull requests against imported team rules and linked business requirements, then supports discussion and saved corrections inside the PR. Users supply their own model key, and Community limits active rules and plugins. Those requirements and configuration limits bound a complete code-review workflow without proving defect-detection accuracy.

Limits: Source-researched AI assessment reviewed by a separate native AI worker. No hands-on product test or human verification is claimed.

Source links and check dates are in Sources and checks below.

Separate website checks

These checks do not add points to the SI Score. They inspect the website's HTML, not the product in use.

Basic website checks100/100

HTTPS: yes
Homepage answered with HTTP 200
Privacy policy link: found
Terms link: found
Contact or about page: found

We check that these pages exist, not what they say. Ownership and company details are not verified.

Checked Oct 18, 2026.

HTML accessibility checks90/100

Page language set: en-US
Mobile viewport: yes
Images with a text alternative: 73 of 104
Main heading (h1): yes

Automated checks on the homepage HTML only. This is not a full accessibility audit.

Checked Oct 18, 2026.

Homepage HTML response100/100

First byte after 367 ms
Homepage HTML loaded in 0.5 s
HTML size 179 KB

Measured once from our server. Images, scripts and your own connection are not included.

Checked Oct 18, 2026.

Trackers in homepage HTML88/100

Third-party trackers in the homepage code: Google Tag Manager

Only the homepage HTML is checked. Trackers loaded later by scripts, and what the service does with your data, are not covered.

Checked Oct 18, 2026.

Page date hints100/100

Server says last modified: Sun, 18 Oct 2026 00:17:01 GMT

A copyright year is a weak sign of upkeep. It does not prove the content is current.

Checked Oct 18, 2026.

Policy links do not verify a company's conduct. An HTML response time is not application speed. Tracker and accessibility checks miss behavior after page load. Copyright dates do not prove product upkeep.

How the SI Score works →

Unconfirmed details may be unassessed, absent from the pages checked or temporarily unreadable. A missing price does not mean the service is free.

Sources and checks

Supporting pages for product usefulness, site facts, prices and separate website checks. Each record keeps its own date. Reading a page does not establish how well the product performs in use.

kodus.io/
- Product usefulness evidence
- Basic website checks (separate check)Checked Oct 18, 2026
- HTML accessibility checks (separate check)Checked Oct 18, 2026
- Homepage HTML response (separate check)Checked Oct 18, 2026
- Trackers in homepage HTML (separate check)Checked Oct 18, 2026
- Page date hints (separate check)Checked Oct 18, 2026
kodus.io/pricing/
- Product usefulness evidence
kodus.io/privacy-policy/
- Basic website checks (separate check)Checked Oct 18, 2026
kodus.io/terms-of-use/
- Basic website checks (separate check)Checked Oct 18, 2026

Checks without a source link

PricingUnknownChecked Oct 18, 2026
Free planUnknownChecked Oct 18, 2026
Sign-up requiredUnknownChecked Oct 18, 2026
PlatformsUnknownChecked Oct 18, 2026
APIUnknownChecked Oct 18, 2026
Open sourceUnknownChecked Oct 18, 2026

Browse this categoryMore Coding & AI Platforms tools

Something wrong or out of date? Send a correction and an editor will check it against the site. Owners can verify their site first so their corrections are marked as coming from the owner. Owners cannot change the score.

Suggest a correction Claim this listing