Notta
AI meeting notetaker that turns meetings, interviews, or lectures into searchable text or visuals.
- SI Score
- 74/100
- Pricing
- Freemium
- Free plan
- Not confirmed
- Sign-up required
- Not confirmed
Ask SI about Notta
Answers use saved listing facts and recorded sources.Homepage screenshot

What it does
Notta is an AI meeting notetaker that turns meetings, interviews, or lectures into searchable text or visuals. It transcribes, summarizes, and supports collaboration in a single workflow, with 58 languages supported. It also generates presentations, infographics, and insights from recordings.
Notta records and transcribes meetings, interviews, and lectures, then turns them into searchable text or visuals. The homepage says it supports 58 languages and offers 120 free minutes with full transcription. It can generate presentations, infographics, and insights from recordings. The pricing page lists a Free plan with 120 transcription minutes per month, up to 3 minutes per conversation, 50 file uploads per month, and 10 AI summaries per month. Pro costs $8.17 per month billed annually and raises limits to 1,800 transcription minutes per month and up to 5 hours per recording. Business adds unlimited transcription and collaboration features. Enterprise is custom and starts from 51 seats. The site says it is SOC 2 Type II certified and GDPR compliant. It also says it integrates with Google Drive, Notion, Slack, Salesforce, Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet. The homepage claims 10M+ users and 98%+ accuracy. These are vendor claims, not independent test results. The free plan limits each conversation to 3 minutes, so it may not fit long meetings. The site does not state whether an API is available or whether the software is open source.
- Transcribes and summarizes in one workflow
- Supports 58 languages for transcription and translation
- Free plan includes 120 transcription minutes per month
- Generates presentations, infographics, and insights
- Free plan limits each conversation to 3 minutes
- No API or open source information on the official pages
- Accuracy and user count are vendor claims, not independent tests