OpenFGA

openfga.dev ↗

Model fine-grained authorization as relationships and check whether a user can act on an object.

SI Score
80/100
Pricing
Open Source AI reading, not confirmed
Free plan
Not confirmed
Sign-up required
Not confirmed

Ask SI about OpenFGA

Answers use saved listing facts and recorded sources.
Homepage screenshot
Screenshot of the OpenFGA homepage

What it does

OpenFGA is an authorization and permissions engine for applications. Developers define an authorization model, store relationship tuples such as a user being a document's reader, and ask the service whether a particular user has access to an object. The project offers a server, APIs, SDKs, and CLI workflows. It suits applications with permissions that are more involved than a single role field, but teams must design and maintain the model and relationship data.

OpenFGA's getting-started guide builds an authorization model around types such as user and document, with relations such as reader, writer, and owner. A first example can represent a document's owner, write the relevant user-object relationship tuple, then call a permission check to ask whether a user may read that document. The documentation shows the same workflow through SDKs and other interfaces. The model is the important design step. Define the relationships that match the application, then exercise a representative check before adding more object types. OpenFGA's setup documentation covers running a server with Docker or Kubernetes, while its getting-started guide also covers a store, SDK client, model, tuples, and checks. OpenFGA is Apache-2.0-licensed software. The server is an authorization engine, not a database for general application records or a user-management UI. Its best-practice guide warns against putting personal or sensitive data in relationship tuples; use stable, non-sensitive identifiers and keep your application responsible for its broader identity and account lifecycle.

Strengths

  • The docs connect authorization models, relationship tuples, SDK clients, and permission checks in one workflow.
  • The project documents server setup with Docker and Kubernetes as well as API and SDK usage.
  • Fine-grained relationships can express access rules beyond a simple application role.

Watch out for

  • The application team must design, version, and maintain the authorization model and tuple data.
  • Tuple data should avoid personal or sensitive identifiers, as the official best-practices guide cautions.
  • The authorization engine does not replace the application's identity system or account lifecycle.

Best for

  • Applications with relationship-based permissions across users, groups, documents, projects, or other objects.
  • Teams that need a separate authorization service with SDKs and a model they can review.
  • Developers prepared to maintain authorization schemas and relationship tuples.

Sources